You gullible idiot. These documents have no identifiable link to Iraq, other than the odd fact that they appear on a U.S. government site billed as "Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents." There is nothing to suggest that they are either from, or about, the pre-war Iraqi regime. The mainstream news outlets aren't aren't reporting this for the simple reason that they did some basic fact-checking about their sources.

Great post. Don't suppose you could include a quote from a document, huh? went to your first link. Are we now conflating the term "terror" to only alqaida? or should we also say that this doc shows links to sien fein and IRA? or wether underground or PETA? orhow about this doc shows a link between alqaida and OperationRescue? Some have said that Thomas Payne was the first "terrorist" (soething about blowing up british pos offices), or Israel (something about telling britain that they'd blw up hositals)? Does this show a link between U.S and Iraq? (oh, yeah, where'd they get targeting data for their use of chem agents?) or Iraq and Israel? I think not.

Loads of bollocks is what the documents show and the eagerness of liars to dig themselves into ever bigger piles of horse manure.

White House kicks out a large, heaping pile of fuming poo and you can bet some idiots will jump right in thinking they will find answers as to why they were right in believing in Bush. Oh, and Salon has already shot this one down:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/04/13/document_dump/

Great work!
http://tqujgbpn.com/suda/fyqe.html | http://lcdhigjv.com/tywb/zemv.html